To declare our era modern (or post-modern) is a prideful dead end that leaves no room for growth or regression.
Every thought is interested in its own proliferation
The marketplace of ideas is flawed because humans are flawed. They are not rational information processors and more information often leads to worse decisions
The age of print—from Gutenberg to the internet—is a parenthesis in human history, not the natural state. Before print, culture was oral, remixed, and communal; print imposed linearity, fixed text, authorial authority, and property rights over content. Now the internet is restoring pre-print patterns: content is remixed and collaborative, ownership is diminished, and mediators no longer control the conversation. The printing press took centuries to find its purpose, eventually enabling the Reformation, nationalism, and mass democracy—but also witch hunts, censorship, and the commodification of conversation. The lesson for the digital age: focus on expanding institutions that support the good rather than trying to protect against every bad outcome.
Key Takeaways
Before print: oral, remixed, communal culture. After print: linear, fixed, author-as-authority
The internet restores pre-print patterns—content is remixed, ownership diminished, mediators sidelined
Nations, copyright, and mass media are parenthesis-era inventions, not permanent fixtures
The printing press in the early 1500s was 'a technology looking for a purpose'
First newspaper didn't appear until 1605—150 years after Gutenberg
Title pages, page numbers, citations, and indexes only became standard by the 1600s
Coffee house culture fostered status-free discourse; media industrialization killed it
The death blow to public conversation came when media were mechanized, electrified, and industrialized
Bridge genres (blogs, podcasts) connect old and new media by transferring existing conventions
Copyright was designed to control scarcity; the internet is abundance
Universal agreement that copyright is broken—even from incumbents
Shift from copyright to 'credit-right' (e.g., TikTok's attribution model) may be the path forward
Censorship is 'conceived by moralists, given precision by lawyers, carried out by bureaucrats, controlled by elites'
Third-person effect: we believe 'others' are susceptible to influence but not us
In the long term, the chance of truth winning is high—focus on expanding good institutions, not just blocking bad content
Notes
1: The Gutenberg Parenthesis
1: The parenthesis
“A grand exception in the course of history”
Gutenberg / books:
Beginning + end
Linear thinking
Fixed text → trust
Author as authority
Property → content
Nowadays with internet:
Content is remixed, remade
Ownership is diminished
Text → images, emoji, memes, etc.
“Restoration”, “the future is medieval”
Books → radio → “the net” / media
Mediators no longer control the convo
2: Print’s presumptions
False narrative that the Renaissance is where civilization begins
“To declare our era modern (or post-modern) is a prideful dead end that leaves no room for growth or regression.”
Print changed how we think
Creativity, permanence,etc.
Pioneer for industrialization
3: Trepidation
Worries of printing:
Proliferation of lowbrow content
Devaluing rare books
Risk to the church
Too much reading → waste of time
“Every thought is interested in its own proliferation”
2: Inside the parenthesis
4: What came before
Spaces between words in ~200 CE
Punctuation
Silent reading
Paper
Scroll → codex (books)
5: How to print
Matrixes / mold casting
~200 for original bible, 55 standard
More details for original bible print logistics*
Years of hard work, not a flash
6: Gutenberg
Born ~1400
Had to guess which books would be high demand
4 early literacies: sacred, learned, bureaucratic, vernacular
7: After the Bible
Catholocon: dictionary + encyclopedia*
Stereotyping: casting entire pages
Movable type inventor*
Gutenberg seen as the person who fostered education and freedom
8: Print spreads
Colors, illustrations
“Rapid” spread geographically
90 cities by 1480 (40y)
New typefaces, punctuation
“In time, new technologies forge institutional change”
Venice became home of print
First press in US in 1638
9: The troubles
The printing press in early 1500s was “a technology looking for a purpose”
Standardized the German language
Luther & The Reformation
Desacralization of the written word
10: Creation with print
The technology of print essentially didn’t change for first 100-200 years
Plays, novels / fiction
Essays and individualism
↑ “Print 2.0” vs Web 2.0 (creation)
11: The birth of the newspaper
First newspaper in 1605 (150y later)
Rumor was more trusted than print (source + reputation known vs unknown)
Eg. witches, demonology
Not as clean and simple as more truth or less truth with print: in fact both
Posts and postmen, press
The key features of a modern political medium
News / journals as arbiters of truth
News created nationwide communities by reading same content + aware of such
“Print capitalism”
Franklin standardized English
Newspapers → nationalism, here vs there
Addiction to the latest
12: Print evolves until 1800s
Little evolution until 1800s
Title was a major invention
Page #s, citations only standard by 1600s
Indexes
13: Aesthetics of print
Illustrations → sense of place in the world
Chemical engraving
German national font
Jenson font
Glossy pages, aged ink
14: Steam + mechanization of print
Stereotyping
Steam presses: 200 → 800-1000 pages/h
Cheaper paper from wood
Changing aura of books
15: Electricity + industrialization of media
Concerns with radio
“The history of printing has been the history of the abolition of the impression”
↑ 5 centuries to “remove Gutenberg”
16: The meaning of it all
Study of technology vs use of technology
The medium is the message
Print “made possible” the reformation, scientific revolution
Oral unifies, print isolates + objectifies
Secondary orality:
Argument against technological determinism*
With the internet, this is a moment of choice as technology → use of
3: Leaving the parenthesis
17: Conversation vs content
“The death blow to the public conversation was likely struck at the turn of the 20th century when media were mechanized, electrified, and industrialized”
Content had become commodified
Need the tech to shift thru all voices to find those worth listening to
Bridge genre: connect old and new media, transferring existing conventions
eg. blog posts
Coffee house culture*
Disregarded status
17.5:
Regulation of coffee houses to “prevent false news”
Publishers vs coffee houses ownership over content and distribution
Views of communication:
Transmission: movement / distribution of messages (conquer thru media)
Ritual: shared beliefs, maintenance of society at a time, portrayal
Section 230 and content moderation*
Should we promote more speech vs should we allow more speech (1st amendment)
“The marketplace of ideas is flawed because humans are flawed. They are not rational information processors and more information often leads to worse decisions”
18: Death to the mass
The mass: the base, sheeple, mediocre, blindly obedient, etc.
↑ public as object, not participant
Mass is theory, also a means to conceptualize politics, history, culture, economy, media
2 political variants:
Aristocratic defense of elite values vs rise of mass participation
Democratic defense of masses vs the rise of elites bent on total domination
2 views of role of individual:
Imprisoned, alienated, without association
Individual who is separate or immune from the mass
2 views of mass culture:
Insulting vulgar taste of the people
Defending against crass entertainment imposed upon them by industry
2 economic theories:
Marxist force to eliminate class
Capitalistic market to be exploited by
↑ overlying: society is hurting itself
Mass → targeted media
1964 market segmentation
Poll as normative → descriptive
Totalitarian: rule by elites answerable to no one
Mass society: elites and the public try to control each other
Pluralistic: elites are accountable to public, public cannot be controlled due to multiple commitments to diverse, autonomous groups
18.5:
By definition, mass media abhors diversity
Minorities in print*
Hashtag: no one owns it (bottom up)
19: Creativity and control
Third-person effect: “others” (not you/me) are susceptible to mass media influence
Fundamental attribution error etc.
The illusion of personal objectivity
Media puts a warped mirror before us: “to it wants make viewers they are better than they are and the world worse than it is”
History of censorship, licensing, regulation*
Freedom of expression
How to define and censor harm and hate?
19.5:
Nixon, pornography, moral panic
Moral panic → social control
Power dynamic of censorship: “an instrument conceived of by moralists, given precision by lawyers, carried out by bureaucrats, but ultimately in the control of elites who set norms…”
In the long term, the chance of truth winning is high
Different author + publisher monetization methods*
Strengthening, lengthening of copyright
—
Does discourse / discussion have a copyright?
Copyright: controlling scarcity
Internet is abundance
Universal agreement that copyright is broken (even from incumbents)
Copyright → “credit-right”
Eg. TikTok
20: Institutional revolutions
“Print enabled conversation until conversation was commodified by media”
Institutions: the rules, norms, and standards that govern behavior + the organizations that execute and enforce them
“In the darwinian struggle between nations, firms, and individuals, societies are driven to find institutions that get the job done best under the circumstances faced at the time”
Privacy concerns → dislike with being measured
Are police a “forever institution”?
Nations are a parenthesis invention
Story vs objectivity
Theory of mind is not as objective, effective as we’d hope (eg. clashing interpretations of history)
We can’t possibly understand the incomprehensible complexity of our world
But ML/AI is a tool to ↑
Books: linear stories, web: exploding complexity
Recommendation: “embrace the chaos” and keep new tech unregulated (eg. internet)
Study: only 1% users → 80% fake news exposures, 0.1% → 80% of shares
Solution / what worked before: focusing on expanding institutions supporting the good, rather than protecting against the bad