The standard narrative of human history – from egalitarian bands to agricultural hierarchy – is largely a myth. Archaeological and anthropological evidence reveals that early humans consciously experimented with diverse political forms, cycling between hierarchical and egalitarian structures seasonally and deliberately. Agriculture didn't automatically create states or inequality; many farming societies remained stubbornly non-hierarchical for millennia. The real question isn't "what went wrong" but why we got stuck in rigid hierarchies. Indigenous critiques of European society, particularly from figures like Kandiaronk, helped spark the Enlightenment itself.
“A man motived by interest cannot be a man of reason.”
“One thing we can now say with a fair degree of certainty is that bureaucracy did not begin simply as a practical solution for problems of information management when human societies advanced beyond a particular threshold of scale and complexity.”
“Embracing the view that events unfold in cumulative sequences as opposed to recapitulating some deeper pattern rendered us less able to weather the vicissitudes of war, injustice, and misfortune – plunging us instead into an age of unprecedented anxiety and, ultimately, nihilism.”
Key Takeaways
The linear story of bands → tribes → chiefdoms → states doesn't match the evidence
Early humans lived in large, complex societies that defy simple categorization
The "agricultural revolution" didn't cause a sudden shift to hierarchy and inequality
Many societies deliberately alternated between hierarchical and egalitarian forms seasonally
This wasn't primitive – it reflected sophisticated political awareness
The capacity for self-conscious political argument existed long before writing
Some farming societies remained non-hierarchical for thousands of years
The link between surplus, storage, and domination is not inevitable
Many early cities show no evidence of centralized authority or elite quarters
Kandiaronk and other Indigenous intellectuals directly challenged European social norms
Their arguments about freedom and equality were widely published and debated in Europe
The "Western" values of liberty and equality may have partially originated from Indigenous thought
Humans demonstrated enormous political flexibility for most of history
The loss of ability to reimagine and restructure social arrangements is relatively recent
Three forms of domination – control of violence, information, and charisma – combined to create rigid hierarchies
Notes
1: Farewell of humanity’s childhood
Old story: Hobbs, Russeu
We are fundamentally bad, warring
Agriculture → civilizing, government
Consequences:
Strict rules
Can’t imagine reinvention of society
Hunter gatherer: small groups, no specialization
Hierarchy is inevitable
Anarchy through anecdotes
Steven Pinker, enlightenment thinkers
Success, productivity vs happiness
Requirement of market economy
Wording frames outlook
Inequality vs class power
How did inequality emerge?
Implications on social change today?
2: Wicked liberty: myth of progress
Great man theory
Argument: appeal to reason, liberty, equality, fraternity before enlightenment
Natives: autonomy, refused arbitrary power
Rational debate, challenging authority
“A man motived by interest cannot be a man of reason”
European view: specialization → inequality, lack of autonomy necessary
Property is the root of the problem
Noble savage vs stupid savage
No established definition of egalitarian
3: Unfreezing the ice age
Human tendencies assumed to be innate
Emotions, language, music
Exponentially more diversity before
Sapient paradox: historical lag in the formation of early human culture
Are we innately hierarchical or egalitarian?
Evidence: monuments, graves → hierarchy
Tolerance of eccentricity
Intellectual equals, different foundations
Seasonal, oscillating patterns of life
Festivals allowed for different hierarchies
How did we lock in to current hierarchy?
4: Origins of culture and private property
Private property drives hierarchy
Delayed return, ongoing relationships
Leisure vs productivity: happiness?
Poverty point: advanced early society
Cause for ignorance: legacy of colonialism
Claimed no private property rights
Claimed primitive, non-hierarchical
They were in atypical environments
Sacred ↔ private property
↑ possessive individualism
Romans: right to destroy property
Natives: obligation to protect
5: The problem with “modes of production”
Natives were anti-agricultural
Nostradic languages: origin of language
Clustering of native cultural traits
Culture, tech adoption influenced by values
Freedom, autonomy to adopt tech
Optimal foraging theory:
6: How Neolithic people avoided agriculture
Çatalhöyük: Turkey, ~7000 BC
Not agricultural, as civilized as thought
Fertile Crescent:
Agricultural domestication ↔ forbidden fruit
Making life easier → dependence
3,000 years to transition to agriculture
Leisurely, playful knowledge creation
Back and forth process, not linear
Farming → new patterns of life, ritual
Not linked with conflict, violence
7: Spread of agriculture
Evidence of trade, specialization
Not strictly linked to private property, gov’t
Not a unanimous, rapid spread
Ecological imperialism
Only 2 periods in last 200k years with suitably temperate climate (130k, 12k YA)
Holocene → Anthropocene
Ecological freedom: enough diversity in diet so as not to be reliant on agriculture
European pop rise, fall around 4500 BC
8: Early cities
Scale → more varied views → conflict?
Dunbar’s number: nested arrangements
Ecological role in city formation
Proof of highly egalitarian cities
Sumerian city: birthplace of a lot
Caste systems based on “dirtiness”
Consensus voting process
9: Social housing and democracy
Tenochtitlan: cultural inversion: celebration of shared cultural values, no leader