Octopuses are an independent experiment in complex minds. Humans and cephalopods diverged from a flattened, worm-like ancestor, then built intelligence along radically different paths: our centralized nervous system versus the octopus’s distributed, “ladder-like” brain. That makes cephalopods a powerful test of embodied cognition, subjective experience, and what consciousness can be.
Consciousness likely grows from the link between sensing and action, not sensation alone. Working memory, broadcast / integration, novelty-seeking, and flexible control turn perception into experience. Octopus arms complicate the picture: their local brains act independently yet remain consciously steerable – less like a single command center than a brain and arms “playing jazz.”
Chappy’s Review
An interesting investigation into how cephalopods think different than humans but not as relevant to cognitive science as I would’ve hoped. A good relaxing read though!
Key Takeaways
Nervous systems likely originated 500–700 MYA with jellies and sponges
Scavenging → predation accelerated the evolution of sensing, action, and intelligence
Sensory-motor view: nervous systems connect perception to movement
Action-creation view: nervous systems also generate actions themselves
“Ladder-like” nervous system rather than a spinal cord
Arm brains act locally like automatic breathing but remain consciously controllable
No hard parts except the beak → extreme bodily flexibility and less bounded control
Octopus morphology is unusually soft and changeable
Intelligence extends through arms and skin rather than sitting only in the head
Latecomer view: consciousness evolved recently
Transformation view: later capacities transformed subjective experience rather than creating it
Pain studies suggest subjective experience is widely distributed among animals
Seeking novelty is a key signal of consciousness
Split-brain cases show experience can remain without full sensory unity
People can navigate around objects without consciously seeing them
Associations spanning more than ~1 second require conscious memory
Working memory: (1) phonological loop (audio) (2) visuospatial sketchpad (pictures + shapes) (3) executive control device
Internal commentary is not essential for complex thought
Efference copy lets the brain predict an action’s sensory effects and may help generate internal monologue
Cuttlefish change colors spectacularly but cannot see color
Octopuses can sense light with their skin
Color change serves (1) camouflage (2) signaling, with possible social communication uses
Octopuses are not group-social like many other intelligent species
They recognize individual humans and understand when they are contained or experimented on
Octopolis creates unusual status, aggression, memory, and social-navigation pressures
Notes
1: Meetings Across the Tree of Life
Cephalopods have complex nervous systems
Common ancestor to humans: flattened worm-like creature
How did subjective consciousness evolve?
“The sea is the original home of the mind”
Philosophy, animals, and evolution
2: A History of Animals
Multicellular likely arose due to improper cell division
Two roles of nervous system: sensing and action
More and more internal → brain
Two views:
Sensory-motor view
Creating actions themselves
Nervous systems likely originated 500-700 MYA with jellies, sponges
Box jellyfish are the most capable non-bilatarian animals
Scavenging → predation accelerated evolution
3: Mischief and Craft
Octopuses uniquely have no hard parts except beak - very morphable
Can tell they’re contained / experimented, recognize individual humans
Not group social like other intelligent species
Distributed, “ladder-like” brain / nervous system unlike other species with spinal chords
Embodied cognition: body itself encodes intelligence and how we must deal with the environment
↑ unlike humans, octopuses have much less of this (eg. all soft so less bounded)
4: From White Noise to Consciousness
Goal to explain evolution of subjective perception / consciousness
How same sensory input leads to differing belief / actions
Doesn’t accept that all living things have subjective experience (unless lots of evidence for it)
Study: consciousness depends on the link between sensing and action (can’t just be sensing)
Unity of senses is surprisingly not needed (eg. split brain)
People can navigate around objects without consciously seeing
We can only learn associations non-consciously if <1s between - otherwise needs conscious memory
The latecomer view: ↑ thus consciousness only evolved recently
The transformation view: opposing view that ↑ instead transformed subjective experience not brought into being by “”
Studies proving pain is widely perceived among animals
Seeking novelty is key to consciousness
Octopus arm brains akin to automatic breathing but consciously controllable
Or might be like brain and arms “playing jazz” - synthesis of two
5: Making Colors
Cuttlefish can change colors spectacularly but can’t see color
Brand new study shows Octopuses can see with their skin (in their arms)
Reasons for color change evolution:
Camouflage
Signaling
↑ but there are clearly other social use cases too
Might be used for communication
6: Our Minds and Others
Is internal commentary necessary?
Emerging consensus: not essential for the formation of complex thoughts
Language is input and output
Efference copy: brain sends copy of action to others parts of brain to adapt sensory input
Eg. walking around changes vision
↑ listening to yourself speak and correcting if it came out wrong → internal monologue
3 components of working memory:
Phonological loop (audio)
Visiospatial sketchpad (pictures + shapes)
Executive control device (controls ↑↑)
2 things needed for consciousness:
Working memory / “workspace”
Broadcast / integration
Unlike human thinking and writing, not much room for efference with cuttlefish changing colors
7: Experience Compressed
Obvious evolutionary reasons for aging*
Positive feedback loop of senescence
8: Octopolis
Color indicative of aggression / status
Octopolis is unique because it requires more social navigation