Automation is coming for tasks > jobs and the distinction matters. AI makes tacit knowledge explicit through pattern recognition, steadily encroaching on manual, cognitive, and affective capabilities that were once considered uniquely human. The result won't be mass unemployment overnight but instead a combination of frictional unemployment and eventual structural unemployment where there simply aren't enough tasks left for humans to justify wages. The response requires not just education reform but a fundamental rethinking of distribution – conditional basic income, better taxation of capital and data, and new sources of meaning beyond work.
Key Takeaways
Automation is task-based, not job-based – the ALM hypothesis
AI's pragmatist revolution shifted from copying human cognition to optimizing task performance
Systems are opaque because their patterns don't need to make sense to us
Decoupling of human/traditional capital
Mismatch of skills: workers can't do the new jobs
Mismatch of identity: workers won't accept lower-skill roles
Mismatch of place: jobs exist but in the wrong geography
Complementing effects (productivity, bigger pie, changing pie) have diminishing returns as AI capabilities grow
Humans may become like horses after 1900 – capabilities simply overshadowed
The great decoupling: 1995-2015 saw 30% productivity growth but only 16% pay growth
Need to tax workers benefiting from automation, capital, robots, inheritance, and companies
College return is ~15% but 80% of that value is signaling, not skills
Conditional basic income with contribution obligations (elder care, arts, education) preserves purpose
Hunter-gatherers had 5-6 hours of daily leisure – work-as-identity is historically unusual
Roots of maladaptive behavior often trace to childhood trauma and perceived helplessness
Purpose must be actively constructed through community obligations, education, and creative contribution
Notes
1: The context
1: A history of misplaced anxiety
Total wealth → inequality, power, purpose
Substituting vs complementing effects
2: The age of labor
Skill premium: HS vs college education pay
↑ historically hasn’t always favored high-skill jobs like it does now
Explicit vs tacit knowledge jobs
Moravec’s paradox
Automation is task-based, not job-based
ALM hypothesis
3: The pragmatist revolution
Early AI: just copy humans
Pragmatist revolution: AI based on task performance, not means of solving
Shift away from using AI research to understand human cognition
AI researchers ↔︎ religious theologians
Modern AI research akin to evolution: “blind watchmaker”, not divine creation
4: Underestimating machines
AI makes tacit knowledge explicit (patterns)
Systems are opaque because patters don’t make sense to us (and shouldn’t have to)
2: The threat
5: Task encroachment
Good task: clear objective, lots of data
3 main human capabilities:
Manual: physical world
Cognitive:
Effective: interpersonal
AI will keep encroaching on new tasks
6: Frictional technological unemployment
FTE: jobs are there, but can’t taken up
Three reasons:
Mismatch of skills
Mismatch of identity: to lower skill
Mismatch of place: geography
Job market has become polarized: middle skill jobs are getting hollowed out
7: Structural technological unemployment
STE: not enough jobs to do
Three ways complimenting affect raises number of jobs:
Productivity effect: only relevant when still cheaper than automation, human has something to contribute
Bigger pie effect: not necessarily rising demand for humans
Changing pie effect: ↑
Humans like horses of 1900s as capabilities overshadowed by AI
Horsepower → manpower
8: Technology and inequality
Traditional vs human capital
Gini coefficient: rising, rich getting richer
Historic economy by capital source:
Traditional: 1/3, human labor: 2/3
“One of 6 key Econ facts”
Ratio is breaking since 1980s
The great decoupling: ↑
’95-’15: ↑ 30% productivity, 16% pay
% rise in inequality due to technology:
OECD: 80%, IMF: 50% (25% global)
Countries can shape inequality
3: The response
9: Education and its limits
Average college return rate: 15%
Need to teach the right topics
Personalized learning
College value: 80% signaling, 20% skills
10: The big state
Free markets vs central planning
Big state: not production, but distribution
Need to tax workers benefiting, capital (monetary, robots), inheritance, companies
Better laws, accounting code of conduct
UBI: citizens income; what level?
Conditional basic income (CBI)
Contribution obligation: eg. elder care
11: Big tech
Need data, software, and hardware
Network effects
Monopolies entrenching themselves
Big tech outsized influence on society
Self-regulation issue
12: Meaning and purpose
Work: purpose, meaning, status, esteem
↑ not always the case (hunter gatherers)
5-6 hours a day of leisure
CBI: actives society requires them to do
Education, social care, arts
Roots of behavior are childhood trauma
Trauma: perceived helplessness
5 types of trauma:
Abuse: physical, sexual, spiritual
Neglect
Abandonment
Enmeshment: blurring child/adult life
Witnessing tragic events
Trauma vs adversity
4 branches of maladaptation:
Addiction: vices, work, perfectionism
Codependence: excessive dependency
Habituated survival strategies
Attachment disorders
“90% of male rage is helplessness masquerading as frustration”